Nitrification
jimmyj7090 said:
Matt, thanks for piping in.
If it involves nitrification, you can always call on me.
jimmyj7090 said:
...When I mentioned the bioballs/nitrification question I was actually seeing possible increased nitrification as a bad thing like having a little wet dry on a reef, possibly throwing the nitrification - denitrification balance most of us seek for our reefs off, leading to nitrate accumulation...
Okay, the best way to view the nitrification process is as something that occurs at a rate you more or less cannot control. In an established system, nitrification occurs at the rate nitrogenous waste is produced.
If nitrification cannot keep up with the rate of waste production, then you would observe an ammonia or nitrite spike, as those intermediate products accumulate. Nitrification cannot proceed faster than the rate of nitrogenous waste production (there would be nothing to nitrify).
Denitrification is another issue. It occurs at a much slower rate in our aquariums, and because it is an anaerobic process, our established systems aren't well suited for denitrification (hence the slower rate). Some people are very lucky and get good denitrification, but it is hit or miss. For me, in my established system, denitrification occurs at a slower rate than nitrification, hence I observe nitrate accumulation. I eliminate this nitrate by water changes and macroalgae.
So you are right that there can be a nitrification/denitrification imbalance, but that can only come from denitrification not happening fast enough. For those reading along, one can't over nitrify.
The case with mechanical filters is that they alone provide no means for denitrification, and therefore, nitrification occurs without denitrification. Bioballs don't create nitrate anymore or less than live rock, the difference is, live rock can denitrify while bioballs generally cannot (worse, bioballs can trap detritus in an oxic environment, leading to more waste and more nitrate).
So in closing, don't worry about increased nitrification -- it is already happening at the maximum rate in an established system.
jimmyj7090 said:
...I have read (speculation or observation ?) that o3 can actually lead to increased nitrate accumulation but I have no ideas on the details of this......
Again, this could not be possible. Nitrification occurs at the maximum rate in your system already.
However, it is possible for ozone to chemically oxidize nitrogen to nitrate. This is simply nitrification without the bacteria (abiotic). Still, this can't happen any faster than nitrogen is produced.
jimmyj7090 said:
...Also wondering about your thoughts on another question, would nitrifying bacteria be able to survive in an O3 reactor or would the O3 nuke the bacteria that it was exposed to such as in a reactor?...
Bacteria can survive in amazing places, but they'd probably be nuked by the ozone. They may grow higher up in the reactor or in a place where ozone has broken down into oxygen, since they are oxic organisms, but again, that oxygen from ozone won't make them go any faster.
jimmyj7090 said:
...I totally agree with your comments re O3. Thinking and reading about it reccently has led me to think of using ORP measurement to monitor trends in the system but not try to use O3 to artificially rasie the ORP to distorted levels....
I agree too. Chances are, no one's ORP prodbe is that accurate anyways! Including mine.
jimmyj7090 said:
...It has also led me to consider low level use of O3 (with a controller to carefully control it's administeration) with the goal of inproving water clarity and maybe other potential benifits (debatable, this is why we're all talking right). That sounds kind of counter intutive, but I'm saying, determine your existing ORP values, then possibly add small amounts of O3 in hopes of stabilizing swing to some degree and in turn improving water clarity without the hassle and potential drawbacks. If I'm getting it right, If you don't push the limits of O3 application then the risks are very much minimized / negated.
That sounds very smart.
Ozone, if used properly, can be very succesful,
Matt