Over the course of the last 2 years I've built a number of calcium reactors.
(in fact a number of BRS members have them)
Most of them have had a second chamber filled with media to "off gas" the CO2 in the effluent prior to entering the tank. Conventional wisdom has always stated that this was a good way to keep from depressing the systems PH.
From what I've seen, the second chamber has little effect on the water returning to the system. I recently installed a new sump and reactor in my system. I ran the reactor with only the main chamber filled for about 2 weeks, measured the effluent , it was 6.65.
Added media to the second chamber, waited 8 hours and measured the effluent, it is at 6.66 . Granted it was only 8 hours and I should wait and test again after a few days, but I starting to think the second chamber is useless.
Anybody else see different results?
spectrum
(in fact a number of BRS members have them)
Most of them have had a second chamber filled with media to "off gas" the CO2 in the effluent prior to entering the tank. Conventional wisdom has always stated that this was a good way to keep from depressing the systems PH.
From what I've seen, the second chamber has little effect on the water returning to the system. I recently installed a new sump and reactor in my system. I ran the reactor with only the main chamber filled for about 2 weeks, measured the effluent , it was 6.65.
Added media to the second chamber, waited 8 hours and measured the effluent, it is at 6.66 . Granted it was only 8 hours and I should wait and test again after a few days, but I starting to think the second chamber is useless.
Anybody else see different results?
spectrum