Tabittha, yours and Josh's help was greatly appreciated. That was a lot of work. I was surprised by the number of people bringing in samples.
>I was a bit shocked at some of those test reading. My Phosphates were .4<
Most of the phosphate results were quite reasonable. There were a few folks with wacky results. I went back and repeated Kevin's test and obtained the same number. I think there is a chance that some of the high phosphate numbers might have been due to contamination by materials in the container used to transport the water. I suggest that in the future everyone transport their samples in a NEW ziploc bag. One person (not Kevin) transported their sample in an old Coke bottle....well....Coke contains phosphoric acid which will show up I believe as phosphate in the Hanna test we run. Remember, the phosphate test is trying to measure VERY low numbers. FWIW, before we purchased (oops, persued the donation of) the Hanna test kit I tested Liam's Hanna test kit at a meeting using some samples spiked with low and carefully measured phosphate standards from the lab. The meter was very nearly dead on, and I was measuring in incrememts of 0.03 ppm increases in phosphate. I was VERY impressed by the meter's accuracy.
>I use Salifert for everything except and actually checked ALK with a Elos kit and got about 10.2 dHk. I am really concerned about the difference is readings? <
The alkalinity test that we run now is the essence of the definition of alkalinity. I was also very concerned by your number and it was the only wacky number we got for alkalinity. I cannot remember whether we did nor not, but if there was sufficient sample we would have run the test again (that's why we ask for 250 ml, there is enough to re-run alkalinity).
>SG 1.021, Ca 426, Mg 1244, Alk 2.57 mpq and po4 .11
Mine
SG 1.025, Ca 450, mg 1200, alk 9 dKH and po 0 <
2.57 meq/l = 7.2 dKH. 426 ppm vs. 450 ppm is a 5% difference, our testing methodology will not distinguish between that kind of difference, likewise for Mg 1244 vs. 1200 (4% difference). For most of these parameters if you are between 390-500 calcium, and 1250-1350 magnesium it is, IMO/IME, very unlikely that you will have any corals suffering.
>I was surprised that the SG was off, I guess I need to recalibrate my refractometer.<
We had a refractometry standard at the meeting that everyone is welcome to take home small quantities of to recalibrate their refractometers.
>Will you be doing water testing at the Bridgewater Meeting ?<
Yup.
>what test kits BRS use?<
Discussed in detail here:
http://www.bostonreefers.org/forums/showthread.php?t=45164