I just setup NP BioPellets on my system

Leroy

Pres. NE Matchcover Club
About 3 weeks ago Patrick, owner of Aqua Addicts in Salem NH, mentioned a new product that was about to be available, NP BioPellets. I asked him to put an order in for me. It arrived today and went to pick them up. I was anxious to get the product as I wanted to put them through my system after reading many web sites and the RC thread. I'm using 2 media reactors with 1000ml for 215 gal water volume. I'm still using GFI and carbon. I installed an air stone to supply depleted oxygen during the off cycle as recommended. The NP BioPellets output is directed above the skimmer pump intake to my Reef Octopus 5000. I'll monitor my nitrates and phosphates after the two to four week period when the pellets are in full bacteria to colonize.

http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1694529&highlight=biopellets
http://www.reefinterests.com/content/view/18/36/
http://reefbuilders.com/2009/10/19/...d-usher-in-a-new-era-of-oligotrophic-reefing/

Package 1000ml
BioPellets.jpg


Two media reactors with equal amounts of NP Biopellets for 215 gallons
BioPellets1.jpg


Two media reactors of NP Biopellets on the sump.
BioPellets2.jpg
 
Output of NP BioPellets directly above skimmer pump.
BioPellets3.jpg


Still a good measure to use GFI with no adverse effects to the system or pellets
BioPellets4.jpg
 
this is interesting i'll be following along. so are these supposed to act like bio-balls would or do they have a different function?
 
this is interesting i'll be following along. so are these supposed to act like bio-balls would or do they have a different function?
Absolutely not, nothing at all in way. I'll just have to copy and paste the detailed information.

I've had my eye on this product for 2 months ever since a LFS mentioned its availability. Done the research and knowing I won't need to use any other nitrate or phosphate media. It'll replace my GFO in a reactor. Here's some useful information from Marine Depot.

How it works
The positive effects of NP-reducing BioPellets on water quality are based on the principle of immobilization. Waste products from the water, mainly nitrate and phosphate, are converted into bacteria. This keeps the aquarium water clean.

NP-reducing BioPellets are composed of biologically degradable polymers that can be placed in a fluidized filter or filter canister. The pellets will allow aerobic growth of bacteria which consequently will consume nitrate and phosphate simultaneously. The bacteria will use up the carbon from the BioPellets, whilst nitrogen and phosphorus are taken from the water as nitrate and (ortho)phosphate. This conversion of organic BioPellets (together with inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus) into microbial biomass is called immobilization. In addition, anaerobic layers will develop, resulting in additional denitrification.

The surplus of bacteria will be consumed by filter and suspension feeding organisms such as sponges and corals, or skimmed off by a protein skimmer. On average this “solid Vodka method” takes 2-4 weeks to give rise to sufficient bacteria to allow nitrate and phosphate levels to drop. The main advantage of this method over using Vodka or sugar as a carbon source is that NP-reducing BioPellets stimulate local growth of bacteria in a filter compartment, instead of all over in the aquarium where they may clog up pipes and hoses. They also prevent the growth of cyanobacteria, as the bacteria growing on NP-reducing BioPellets will compete with these phototrophic nuisance microbes. Finally, NP-reducing BioPellets will save the aquarist a lot of time, as no daily dosages of carbon are required.

Product guidelines
NP-reducing Biopellets can be placed in canister filters or fluidized reactors. The latter configuration may yield better results, and prevents detritus buildup. A proper starting dosage is 0.5-1 liter of pellets per 500 liters of system volume (12,5-25 fl. oz. for every 100 USG). After about 2-4 weeks, nitrate and phosphate levels should start decreasing. For some aquaria experiencing heavy feeding, higher dosages are appropriate. Examples are aquaria which house large quantities of azooxanthellate corals, sponges, tunicates or large schools of Anthias fish. Dosages may be increased indefinitely, provided the aquarium water is sufficiently aerated.

NP-reducing BioPellets are consumed by bacteria, which is why new pellets need to be added every 3-6 months to compensate for digested substrate. This can be seen during inspection of the filter. These figures however depend on aquarium conditions and are strongly influenced by feeding regimes and livestock. Taking regular measurements of both nitrate and phosphate levels in the aquarium is recommended, after which dosages may be increased or decreased.

We also suggest placing the outlet of the pellet filter in front of a protein skimmer, to limit the amount of bacteria entering the system. This has the additional benefit of increased gas exchange (CO2-removal and O2-addition). The pellets should never be used without sufficient aeration, as this may lead to low oxygen and pH levels, especially during night time. Proper aeration can be established with air pumps and protein skimmers.

When heavy feeding is required, it is recommended to combine the pellets with standard phosphate adsorbents. The reason for this is that most aquarium feeds contain higher levels of phosphate than is consumed by bacteria, fish and invertebrates, when compared to nitrogen. Some phosphate adsorbents however deplete alkalinity and may reduce pH. Using phosphate adsorbent media based on iron hydroxide does not have this disadvantage.

Important:

* Maintain sufficient water flow through the BioPellets, to prevent production of hydrogen sulphide gas.
* The use of ozone and UV will negatively affect bacterial recruitment of the BioPellets and increase the maturation time of the filter. Adding bacterial cultures may alleviate this problem and shorten filter maturation time in general.
* When nitrate and phosphate are already very low before applying BioPellets, a decrease in these levels may not be detectable with standard aquarium testkits.
 
Awesome Sherri, we'll both be down to 0 on our nitrates and phosphates. Any hair algae will be gone and cyano doesn't stand a chance to even take hold. Our glass will be so clean we'll never have to run a magnetic glass cleaner again. The inside of the PVC plumbing will be as clean as new. Fish and corals that were hard to keep will thrive on the bacterial food source and plankton. Much safer than vodka or sugar dosing. Never have to change out the pellets just add to what has dissolved. We've got a jump on the product with a potential of great results.
I'll continue with GFO but to a minimum.
 
Last edited:
that sounds like it is a fantastic idea if it works. Hopefully it isn't snake oil. I was reading through the posts but I don't feel like reading 24 pages. Can someone spoil the ending? Did it work for the people?
 
Awesome Sherri, we'll both be down to 0 on our nitrates and phosphates. Any hair algae will be gone and cyano doesn't stand a chance to even take hold. Our glass will be so clean we'll never have to run a magnetic glass cleaner again. The inside of the PVC plumbing will be as clean as new. Fish and corals that were hard to keep will thrive on the bacterial food source and plankton. Much safer than vodka or sugar dosing. Never have to change out the pellets just add to what has dissolved. We've got a jump on the product with a potential of great results.
I'll continue with GFO but to a minimum.


Jeeze Leroy, it's like you just gave Mr.Murphy an atomic weggie or something ;)

Really though, this stuff does sound really promising to me as well. Carbon dosing without the daily hassel and risk of daily dosing, what could be better :) Keep up posted on how this goes, please.
 
Tagging along, this product seems like a god send.

Do you plan on getting a baseline to see how quickly and well it works? Nitrate and phosphate levels?
 
I would be curious to hear what some of the other experienced reefers in here think like Greg hiller, Randy Holmes-farley, etc... Hopefully they chime in if they think this is a worthwile product to try or not.

If not, Leroy and Sherri can keep us updated.
 
Interesting....... Never heard of this before. Is the media expensive?
It's new, only been out for a month. Been researching it for a month before using it. I felt it's a positive product with no negative feedback on it. A 500ml is $60 and a 100ml is $120.

that sounds like it is a fantastic idea if it works. Hopefully it isn't snake oil. I was reading through the posts but I don't feel like reading 24 pages. Can someone spoil the ending? Did it work for the people?
.
I was waiting to see those two words "snake oil". I seriously doubt it will be pegged as that. Being new to the market not much has been broadcasted with the home reef hobbyist. I have to wait 2 to 4 weeks for bacteria to build within the reactor.

Jeeze Leroy, it's like you just gave Mr.Murphy an atomic weggie or something ;)

Really though, this stuff does sound really promising to me as well. Carbon dosing without the daily hassel and risk of daily dosing, what could be better :) Keep up posted on how this goes, please.
If I could give Mr Murphy an atomic weggie then payback is sweet.
No daily carbon dosing, no vodka ml to increments of required dosage. Proof will be in my tank as well as Sherri's for 0 nitrates and phosphates. No hair algae or cyano outbreak and a beneficial feed for the tank.

Tagging along, this product seems like a god send.

Do you plan on getting a baseline to see how quickly and well it works? Nitrate and phosphate levels?
My nitrates tested today are close to 10 and phosphates are close to 0.10, tested with Salifert test kits. I should start seeing results in 2 to 4 weeks with water test and visually some bryopsis I have. Before the Biopellets I was increasing my Magnesium. I'll maintain my mag at presently 1400 not wanting to go to 1500 or more. I'm expecting to see the bryopsis decrease within a few weeks.
 
will this help with Cyano? I am at wits end with mine. Hope you have good results with this. If so, ill be buying it.
 
I would be curious to hear what some of the other experienced reefers in here think like Greg hiller, Randy Holmes-farley, etc... Hopefully they chime in if they think this is a worthwile product to try or not.

If not, Leroy and Sherri can keep us updated.
By all means any feedback from them is welcomed.
 
will this help with Cyano? I am at wits end with mine. Hope you have good results with this. If so, ill be buying it.
The surplus of bacteria will be consumed by filter and suspension feeding organisms such as sponges and corals, or skimmed off by a protein skimmer. On average this “solid Vodka method” takes 2-4 weeks to give rise to sufficient bacteria to allow nitrate and phosphate levels to drop. The main advantage of this method over using Vodka or sugar as a carbon source is that NP-reducing BioPellets stimulate local growth of bacteria in a filter compartment, instead of all over in the aquarium where they may clog up pipes and hoses. They also prevent the growth of cyanobacteria, as the bacteria growing on NP-reducing BioPellets will compete with these phototrophic nuisance microbes. Finally, NP-reducing BioPellets will save the aquarist a lot of time, as no daily dosages of carbon are required.
 
Actually my measurable phosphates have always been zero as well as nitrates. So I am doing it to battle the unmeasurable phosphates as I have some hair algae and cyano. I am looking at my fluidized reactor and will be setting it up today. I will report back on my starting params but I think they are zero. As I said -- my success will be measured by the visible reduction of the algaes. Of course my tangs won't be happy as they love lipping the glass algae!
 
I'm not sure I understand the point of this if you have to run GFO in tandem. Can someone explain?
When heavy feeding is required, it is recommended to combine the pellets with standard phosphate adsorbents. The reason for this is that most aquarium feeds contain higher levels of phosphate than is consumed by bacteria, fish and invertebrates, when compared to nitrogen. Some phosphate adsorbents however deplete alkalinity and may reduce pH. Using phosphate adsorbent media based on iron hydroxide does not have this disadvantage.
 
Back
Top