We read here about ich control vs ich eradiaction, proper QT process for new livestock, and a lot about HYPO to treat the ich. I've done it / used it myself. Candidly, it is a PITA
My understanding is that Copper is supposed to be another successful treatment methodology
I guess the question is...if you have a dedicated livestock QT, and you pull out the LR, why would you stress a fish for 6-8 weeks in a small tank, having to painstakingly adjust and maintain hypo, when you can cupramine the fish and be done in a few days - for the cost of one QT of water?
I was in an LFS recently, and when I pointed out obvious ich on a fish, the copper treatment was added immediately. It was a FO system.
Can anyone point out the reasons why copper is better or worse than 8 weeks of hypo?
Reason I am asking, is as I rebuild, I need to replace the dozen fish I lost in my crash...and I'd like them in the tank by the holiday season.....
My understanding is that Copper is supposed to be another successful treatment methodology
I guess the question is...if you have a dedicated livestock QT, and you pull out the LR, why would you stress a fish for 6-8 weeks in a small tank, having to painstakingly adjust and maintain hypo, when you can cupramine the fish and be done in a few days - for the cost of one QT of water?
I was in an LFS recently, and when I pointed out obvious ich on a fish, the copper treatment was added immediately. It was a FO system.
Can anyone point out the reasons why copper is better or worse than 8 weeks of hypo?
Reason I am asking, is as I rebuild, I need to replace the dozen fish I lost in my crash...and I'd like them in the tank by the holiday season.....