I'll comment on a few things mentioned:
>I have yet to see any scientific data that made me believe that purchasing the fancy reactor medias are worth the $$$<
Then you have not read my articles now have you?
Or, maybe what you mean is, you read the articles, but just because one substrate may have more phosphate than another, does that REALLY prove one is better than another...you got me there.
I was going to post the links to my two articles, but unfortunately, one of them has 'aged' in internet time, and the link is dead. Still, the one below addesses some of the issues.
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/april2003/short.htm
>How tough are these things to set up once you have one? How much maintenance do they require?<
I have found that calcium reactors are easy to set up and are quite forgiving in the way you manage them. I do almost all adjustments by 'eyeball' anymore. Having some extra CO2 going into your tank IME has not really been an issue, particularly if you have a decent protein skimmer to blow it off.
>I've heard a theory that some media might contain phosphates (PO4). If that's true, could the phosphate be liberated, and then dripped into the tank<
Yup...it is by and large.
>I have a question I wish someone could answer, I have seen this stated many times that a Calcium reactor will not by itself increase Calcium levels, but when the Calcium levels are increased by the addition of Calcium Chloride or similar product it will maintain that level. Having recently set up a reactor this is exactly what happened, but I don't understand why it will not increase the Calcium by itself.<
Answered earlier by others, but I'll rephrase again. A BIG calcium reactor on a small tank can bring calcium and alkalininty up a lot; if they are both low the reactor can bring them both up. One thing to remember, a calcium reactor will not bring things back in balance if they are out of balance.
>I've also read some posts about mixing "dolomite" in with reactor media. I think the idea was to liberate magnesium. Anyone remember more?<
Dolomite is calcium magnesium carbonate I believe.
I've used it before in reactors, but it did not dissolve as fast as the calcium carbonate substrate. For me it was probably due to the fact that the particle size of the dolomite was too large in comparison to the calcium carbonate. For my big tank I toyed with the idea of having both a calcium reactor, and a dolomite reactor, and tuning them separately. Instead, when I found a cheap source of magnesium chloride this became pointless (would have been VERY expesive to boost at 500-600 gallon system with B-ionic magnesium!!!). It is much easier to just measure the magnesium concentration every-so-often and boost it individually should it be low. In most tanks it will not fall low very fast. I usually measure it every several months.
>No one ever answered my question as to whether all the dolomite would dissolve first leaving undisolved calcium carbonate, or visa versa. <
I think they dissolve at a similar rate if they are of a similar size. Dolomite might have a more stable chemical structure than the aragonite form of calcium carbonate though. If anything, the dolomite is likely to dissolve slower. Craig Bingman used to suggest using 1/10th volume of dolomite in a reactor.
>No calcium reactor, by itself, can bring a tank's calcium and alkalinity from really low levels to acceptable levels <
I also disagree with this statement. BUT, it may in many cases be safer to quickly get both calcium and alkalinity into the correct ranges using additives, as being low in either for even a short period of time can spell doom for many corals, particularly fast growing SPS under intense light (believe me, I've killed my share of frags when my frag tank got low in either calcium, alkalinity, or magnesium). Part of the problem is that sometimes when a person gets a new reactor they are very careful with it, and tend not to be aggressive enough with it's use, VERY slowly dialing it in. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with being careful, but if you are slow, while the calcium and alkalinity is low you can do more harm than good.
>Lets throw in a new talking point: what should somebody who is new to Ca reactors look for when trying to decide which model they should buy? and how much should a customer look to pay? <
I think size of the chamber is important as you don't want to have to be changing the medium out more than once every 3-6 months. The reactor also needs a decent sized recirculation pump, or performance will suffer. One of the more common things to go wrong with a calcium reactor IME is that the outflow line can plug. This can be a significant design flaw in some reactors. It might be nice to have a sensor that monitored the flow and alarmed in some fashion when the flow is interupted.
>I put a reactor on my tank and I can't keep my PH at 8.4 anymore. what should i do?<
8.4 is rather high anyhow. I'd shoot more for 8.2, and not be particularly alarmed unless it is below 8.0.
>with my new fishroom my pH was getting as high as 8.6!
So I adjusted my Ca reactor's output effluent pH to around 6.0 to keep my pH down! This is especially pronounced using the pickling lime instead of the calcium hydroxide and is even more pronounced when I first fill up my kalkreactor with kalk<
To my understanding pickling lime and calcium hydroxide are one and the same. Even if they are not, and pickling lime were in fact calicum oxide, once calcium oxide hits water it becomes calcium hydroxide. The only reason I can think of in which you would get variable results with pH in a Nielson kalk (calcium hydroxide) reactor would be if you were dosing some quantity of undissolved calcium hydroxide (a cloudy solution).